It’s a Nonhuman World (We Just Live Here)

Ash Nichols

"Subjective responses to the environment make environmental literature a little different than, say, science writing," says Professor Ashton Nichols, whose nature writing class lets students explore the natural world and their place in it. Photo by Carl Socolow '77.

Between literature and science lies the fertile world of nature writing

by Tony Moore

When students take American Nature Writing: Environment, Culture and Values, they鈥檙e tackling an 800-pound gorilla that鈥檚 been fed a steady diet of ecocriticism, cultural studies, social-justice theory, environmental science and, of course, straight-up literature.

They look at questions connected to humans鈥 relationship with nature (are we a part of it or distinct from it?), the disposition of nature (is it benign or destructive?) and how and why we should preserve nature in the face of climate change and the unstoppable march of humanity.

It鈥檚 an intellectual handful, so it鈥檚 not surprising that Katie Mooradian 鈥16 (psychology, German) feels as if this unique cross-listing of Environmental Studies 111 and English 101 might be a higher-level class in disguise: 鈥淐onsidering it鈥檚 a 100-level course,鈥 she says, 鈥淚鈥檝e been impressed with not only the breadth of knowledge but also the depth.鈥 

Ahead of the curve

The impressive dimensions of the course originate with its architect, Ashton Nichols, professor of English and environmental studies and the Walter E. Beach 鈥56 Distinguished Chair in Sustainability Studies, who has been living at the intersection of nature and literature since he was a child.

鈥淕rowing up, I always had strong interest in and concern for the natural world,鈥 he says. 鈥淏ut I鈥檝e always also been interested in literature and language, so when I became a professor, it was English that attracted me as a disciplinary study.鈥

With nature writing, and the larger environmental humanities movement, Nichols found his sweet spot. And while in recent years other colleges and universities have been adding courses in the field of study, it鈥檚 one that 51黑料网 students have now been exploring through this course for over two decades.

Accepting the challenge

Sam Bogan 鈥16 (biology) says American Nature Writing has brought together his interests in science, literature and sustainability in a 鈥渂alanced and clear way,鈥 but that doesn鈥檛 mean he鈥檚 been lulled into complacency. 鈥淒espite that harmonious effect,鈥 he says, 鈥渋t鈥檚 also challenged some of my own values and ideologies concerning subjects such as conservation, success and travel.鈥 

Nichols says the challenges presented by the course rarely lead to uniform responses, as the syllabus鈥攚hich includes works by Bill McKibben, Henry David Thoreau and Nichols himself鈥攆orces students to debate internally where they stand on a vast array of issues.

鈥淚 hope students emerge not with single-minded, narrow-minded ways of viewing these questions,鈥 he says, 鈥渂ut with a broader palette of possible questions that they could bring to the literature they read and the environmental issues they confront.鈥

New literary dimensions

With the focus not on strictly scientific works, Mooradian appreciates teasing out the writers鈥 messages from their often poetic, allusive prose. 鈥淭here is something really powerful about conjuring your own perception of the metaphor, prose and imagery you are being presented with,鈥 she says. 

鈥淚t鈥檚 not just reporting,鈥 says Nichols. 鈥淭here are emotional responses to the subject matter. Thoreau wasn鈥檛 an environmentalist; he explores the emotional responses to nature. This continues into the modern era as well, with economic, racial and social-justice dimensions.鈥

These dimensions might be simply intellectual conversation pieces if left unexplored and unchallenged. The process of unpacking it all and making something useful is what Bogan sees as one of the course鈥檚, and its writers鈥, more powerful traits. 

鈥淭he progress that comes from science is generated through those acting upon scientific findings,鈥 says Bogan. 鈥淭he great American nature writers we鈥檝e read in class do just that. The wealth of ecological, natural history, evolutionary and chemical knowledge that writers such as Rachel Carson, Aldo Leopold and Henry David Thoreau understood before writing their greatest works is what allowed them to inspire change.鈥

Through this interdisciplinary approach, Nichols hopes to instill in his students what Thoreau鈥攚hom Nichols refers to as the foundational element of the entire genre鈥攈as been instilling in readers for more than 150 years.

鈥淚f an appreciation for the nonhuman world can emerge or be enhanced,鈥 he says, 鈥渁nd even an understanding of that nonhuman world can be improved by using language and thinking about language and writing, that can only be a good thing.鈥

Faculty Minute: Ashton Nichols 


Learn more

Published May 3, 2014